4.7 Article

Screening and construct-specific detection methods of transgenic Huafan No 1 tomato by conventional and real-time PCR

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 85, Issue 13, Pages 2159-2166

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2193

Keywords

Huafan No 1 tomato; conventional and real-time PCR; genetically modified organisms; screening and construct-specific detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetically modified (GM) tomatoes have been approved for commercialization in many countries since the first GM tomato FLAVR SAVR was permitted for planting in 1994. In China, GM tomato Huafan No I with a character of long shelf-life was the first GM plant which was approved for commercialization in 1996. To meet the requirement of the GM tomatoes labeling policy that has been actualized in China since 2001, screening and construct-specific PCR detection methods for detecting the universal elements transformed into tomato, such as cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV35s) promoter and the nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the specifically inserted heterologous DNA sequence between CaMV35s promoter and anti-sense ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE) gene were set up. To make the detection methods normative, a novel single copy tomato gene LAT52 was also used as an endogenous reference gene in the PCR detection systems. The limit of detection of screening and construct specific detection methods for Huafan No 1 was 68 haploid genome copies in conventional PCR detection, and three copies in TaqMan real-time PCR detection. The limit of quantitation of screening quantitative PCR assays for Huafan No 1 was three copies and was 25 copies for construct-specific quantitative PCR. Two samples with known Huafan No I tomato content were detected using the established conventional and real-time PCR systems, and these results also indicated that the established Huafan No I screening and construct-specific PCR detection systems were reliable, sensitive and accurate. (c) 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available