4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of outcomes of phase II studies and subsequent randomized control studies using identical chemotherapeutic regimens

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 28, Pages 6982-6991

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.679

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine whether promising results from phase II studies could be reproduced in phase III studies, and to examine which characteristics of phase II studies might be of predictive value for subsequent phase III studies. Methods We searched for all phase III studies of chemotherapy in advanced solid malignancies, published in the English language literature from July 1998 to June 2003. Each phase III study was reviewed to identify preceding phase II studies. Phase II and phase III studies included in this analysis must have used identical regimens. Data were extracted from both phase II and phase III studies. Results Of 181 phase III studies identified, 43 used therapeutic regimens identical to those in 49 preceding phase II studies. Twelve phase III studies (28%) were positive. The vast majority (81%) of phase III studies have lower response rates than preceding phase II studies, with a mean difference of 12.9% among all studies analyzed. None of the phase II study characteristics evaluated significantly predicted for positive phase III studies, but the sample size of phase II studies demonstrated a trend toward being predictive (P =.083). Conclusion Promising results from phase II studies frequently do not translate into positive phase III studies. Response rates in most phase III studies are lower than those in preceding phase II studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available