4.7 Article

Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 28, Pages 6992-6998

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2906

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose We evaluated predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Patients and Methods A total of M 59 men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with RP (n = 498) or RT (n = 661) developed PSA failure, and they formed the study cohort. Competing risk regression analyses were used to evaluate whether previously identified predictors of time to metastasis, including post-treatment PSA doubling time (PSA-DT), Gleason score, and interval to PSA failure, could also predict time to PCSM after PSA failure. The cumulative incidence method was used to estimate PCSM after PSA failure. Results A post-RP PSA-DT of less than 3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 54.9; 95% Cl, 16.7 to 180), a post-RT PSA-DT of less than 3 months (HR, 12.8; 95% Cl, 7.0 to 23.1), and a biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10 (HR, 6.1-1 95% Cl, 3.4 to 10.7) for patients treated with RT were significantly associated with PCSM. Post-RP estimated rates of PCSM 5 years after PSA failure were 31% (95% Cl, 17% to 45%) v 1% (95% Cl, 0% to 2%) for patients with PSA-DT of less than 3 months v >= 3 months. Post-RT estimated rates of PCSM 5 years after PSA failure were 75% (95% Cl, 59% to 92%) v 35% (95% Cl, 24% to 47%) for patients with a biopsy Gleason score of >= 8 v <= 7, respectively, and PSA-DT of less than 3 months; these rates were 15% (95% Cl, 0.8% to 28%) v 4% (95% Cl, 1 % to 6%), respectively, for patients with a PSA-DT >= 3 months. Conclusion Patients at high risk for PCSM after PSA failure can be identified based on post-RP PSA-DT or post-RT PSA-DT and biopsy Gleason score. These parameters may be useful in identifying patients for a randomized trial evaluating hormonal therapy with or without docetaxel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available