4.4 Article

Disruptive and dangerous behaviour by patients on acute psychiatric wards in three European centres

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 822-828

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0967-1

Keywords

aggression; absconding; substance misuse; medication adherence; restraint; seclusion; sedation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The disturbed behaviour of acute in- patients can have serious consequences, and methods of management are contentious and vary between countries. Little is known about this variation and its relationship to the characteristics of in- patient populations. Aim The aim of this study was to compare rates and patterns of disturbed behaviours and containment methods in acute psychiatric wards in three centres in the United Kingdom, Italy and Greece. Method A retrospective survey of medical and nursing records ( n= 838) at seven hospitals for the first 2 weeks of patients' admissions was done using a structured data collection tool. Results Nearly all types of disruptive behaviour varied by centre, with rates being generally higher in the UK and lowest in Italy. Specific relationships between different behaviours were replicated across all three centres. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to be subject to containment measures in all centres, even when their behaviours did not differ from the majority. Rates of containment method use were only partially related to the frequency of disturbed behaviour. Conclusions More research is required to discover the efficacy of varying containment methods, with a view to minimising their use. Gross international and inter- hospital variation demands large samples rather than single site studies. Clinicians need to reflect upon containment rates that may be, in some places, excessive and incorrectly targeted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available