4.7 Article

Antistaphylococcal activity of ceftobiprole, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 4210-4219

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4210-4219.2005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ceftobiprole (formerly BAL9141), the active component of the prodrug BAL5788 (ceftobiprole medocaril), is a novel cephalosporin with expanded activity against gram-positive bacteria. Among 152 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including 5 vancomycin-intermediate and 2 vancomycin-resistant strains, MIC50 and MIC90 values for ceftobiprole were each 0.5 mu g/ml against methicillin-susceptible strains and 2 mu g/ml against methicillin-resistant strains. Against 151 coagulase-negative staphylococci (including 4 vancomycin-intermediate strains), MIC50 and MIC90 values were, respectively, 0.125 mu g/ml and 1 mu g/ml against methicillin-susceptible and 1 mu g/ml and 2 mu g/ml against methicillin-resistant strains. Teicoplanin was less active than vancomycin against coagulase-negative strains. Linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and daptomycin were active against all strains, whereas increased MICs for amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefazolin, minocycline, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin, rifampin, mupirocin, fusidic acid, and fosfomycin were sometimes observed. At 2 x MIC, ceftobiprole was bactericidal against 11 of 12 test strains by 24 h. Prolonged serial passage in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of ceftobiprole failed to select for clones with MICs > 4 times those of the parents; the maximum MIC achieved for ceftobiprole after 50 passages (in 1 of 10 strains) was 8 mu g/ml. Single-passage selections showed very low frequencies of resistance to ceftobiprole irrespective of genotype or phenotype; the maximal ceftobiprole MIC of recovered clones was 8 mu g/ml.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available