4.7 Article

Detecting gravitational waves from precessing binaries of spinning compact objects. II. Search implementation for low-mass binaries

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 72, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.084027

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection template families (DTFs) are built to capture the essential features of true gravitational waveforms using a small set of phenomenological waveform parameters. Buonanno, Chen, and Vallisneri [Phys. Rev. D 67, 104025 (2003)] proposed the BCV2 DTF to perform computationally efficient searches for signals from precessing binaries of compact stellar objects. Here we test the signal-matching performance of the BCV2 DTF for asymmetric-mass-ratio binaries, and specifically for double-black-hole binaries with component masses (m(1),m(2))is an element of[6,12]Mx[1,3]M, and for black-hole-neutron-star binaries with component masses (m(1),m(2))=(10M,1.4M); we take all black holes to be maximally spinning. We find a satisfactory signal-matching performance, with fitting factors averaging between 0.94 and 0.98. We also scope out the region of BCV2 parameters needed for a template-based search, we evaluate the template match metric, we discuss a template-placement strategy, and we estimate the number of templates needed for searches at the LIGO design sensitivity. In addition, after gaining more insight in the dynamics of spin-orbit precession, we propose a modification of the BCV2 DTF that is parametrized by physical (rather than phenomenological) parameters. We test this modified BCV2P DTF for the (10M, 1.4M) black-hole-neutron-star system, finding a signal-matching performance comparable to the BCV2 DTF, and a reliable parameter-estimation capability for target-binary quantities such as the chirp mass and the opening angle (the angle between the black-hole spin and the orbital angular momentum).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available