4.7 Article

Transcriptome analysis of human hepatic and pancreatic stellate cells: organ-specific variations of a common transcriptional phenotype

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
Volume 83, Issue 10, Pages 795-805

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-005-0680-2

Keywords

fibrosis; stellate cell biology; expression profiling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) are thought to be the primary source of the extensive fibrotic reaction characteristic of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis in humans. PSCs share many morphological and functional characteristics with hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), whose central role in liver fibrosis is well established. However, it has remained unclear if hepatic and pancreatic stellate cells are derived from a common cell lineage and if they are completely similar or if they possess organ-specific features. We have analysed the transcriptomes of HSCs, PSCs and skin fibroblasts to assess how the transcriptional phenotype of stellate cells differs from that of a typical fibroblast lineage cell and if there is evidence for a common stellate cell precursor. To this end, we have performed expression profiling of primary cultures of human HSCs, PSCs and skin fibroblasts using 23,000-feature 'whole genome' oligonucleotide micro-arrays. Expression data were verified using real-time PCR. The expression profiles of HSCs and PSCs displayed a great extent of similarity, clearly separating them from the fibroblasts. Predominantly extracellular and cell surface genes, but also signalling molecules, transcription factors and novel neural markers, were concordantly expressed in both stellate cell types. Despite this high degree of similarity, distinct differences in expression patterns were observed between HSCs and PSCs, reflecting organ-specific variations of the common stellate cell-specific phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available