4.7 Article

Detection of galangin-induced cytoplasmic membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus by measuring potassium loss

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 1-3, Pages 243-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.014

Keywords

galangin; antibacterial; mechanism of action; Staphylococcus aureus; flavonol; cytoplasmic membrane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galangin is one of the active antimicrobial principles of propolis or 'bee glue' and Helichrysum aureonitens, a perennial herb used by South African indigenes to treat infection. The effect of this compound and antibacterial agents with known mechanisms of action upon the cytoplasmic membrane integrity of Staphylococcus aureus was investigated by comparing potassium loss profiles from bacterial cell suspensions. Using an agar dilution assay, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the flavonol galangin, the bacteriostatic antibiotic novobiocin and the bactericidal antibiotic penicillin G against Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571 were determined as being 50 mu g/mL, 62.5 ng/mL and 31.3 ng/mL, respectively. When 5 x 10(7) cfu/mL Staphylococcus aureus were suspended in 'potassium-free' media containing 50 mu g/mL galangin, a 60-fold decrease in viability was observed after 12 It. Populations of I x 109 cfu/mL Staphylococcus aureus incubated for 12 h in 50 mu g/mL galangin lost 21% more potassium than untreated control populations. Novobiocin had no effect on potassium loss, but populations incubated in 31.3 ng/mL penicillin G exhibited a 6% increase in potassium loss. This data clearly demonstrates that galangin causes a significant increase in potassium loss from Staphylococcus aureus cells, which may be attributed to either direct damage to the cytoplasmic membrane or indirect damage effected through autolysis/weakening of the cell wall and consequent osmotic lysis. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available