4.7 Article

Headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-olfactometry dilution analysis of young and aged Chinese Yanghe Daqu liquors

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 20, Pages 7931-7938

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf051011k

Keywords

HS-SPME; gas chromatography-olfactometry; young and aged liquor; Chinese liquor; Yanghe Daqu; aroma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aroma compounds of young and aged Chinese Yanghe Daqu liquor samples were extracted by solid phase microextraction (SPME) and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC)-olfactometry dilution analysis. The original liquor samples were diluted with deionized water to give a final alcohol content of 14% (v/v). The samples were stepwise diluted (1:1) with 14% (by volume) ethanol-water solution and then extracted by headspace SPME. The samples were preequilibrated at 50 degrees C for 15 min and extracted with stirring at the same temperature for 30 min prior to injection into GC. The aroma compounds were identified by both GC-MS and GC-olfactometry using DB-Wax and DB-5 columns. The results suggested that esters were the major contributors to Yanghe Daqu liquor aroma. Ethyl hexanoate, ethyl butanoate, and ethyl pentanoate had very high flavor dilution values in both young and aged liquors (FD > 8192). Methyl hexanoate, ethyl heptanoate, ethyl benzoate, and butyl hexanoate could also be very important because of their high flavor dilution values (FD >= 256). Moreover, two acetals, 1, 1-diethoxyethane and 1, 1-diethoxy-3-methylbutane, also were shown high flavor dilution values in Yanghe Daqu liquors (FD >= 256). Other aroma compounds having moderate flavor dilution values included acetaldehyde, 3-methylbutanol, and 2-pentanol (FD >= 32). Comparing young and aged liquors, the aroma profiles were similar, but the aroma compounds in the aged sample had higher flavor dilution values than in the young ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available