4.7 Article

Submillimeter observations of distant red galaxies:: Uncovering the 1 mJy 850 μm population

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 632, Issue 1, Pages L9-L12

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/497636

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : high-redshift; submillimeter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the submillimeter emission of distant red galaxies (DRGs). The DRGs are selected by the criterion J - K > 2.3, and are generally massive galaxies at redshifts higher than 2, with red rest-frame optical colors. Using a deep SCUBA submillimeter image of a field centered on the cluster MS 1054-03, we obtain a statistical detection of the DRGs at redshift z = 2-3.5, with an average 850 mu m flux density of 1.11 +/- 0.28 mJy. The detection implies an average star formation rate (SFR) of 127 +/- 34 M-circle dot yr(-1) (lensing corrected), assuming that the far-infrared (FIR) spectral energy distribution (SED) is well described by a modified blackbody. The SFR derived from the submillimeter agrees well with SFRs derived from SED fitting of optical-near-infrared data and average X-ray emission. Constant star formation models imply ages of 2 Gyr, extinction mag, which is A(V) = 2.4 mag, which is consistent with the FIR to rest-frame optical luminosity ratio of similar to 15. DRGs are older and have lower SFRs relative to optical luminosity than (ultra-) luminous infrared galaxies, although their FIR luminosities are similar. The DRGs at 2 < z < 3.5 and the extremely red objects (I - K > 4) at 1 < z < 2, which were also investigated, contribute 5.7 and 5.9 Jy deg(-2), respectively, to the submillimeter background. Simple estimates suggest that these populations contribute similar to 50% of the flux from sources with 0.5 < f(850) < 5mJy, which is where the peak of energy is produced. We have therefore uncovered one of the most important populations of galaxies contributing to the submillimeter background.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available