4.7 Article

Rapid timescales for accretion and melting of differentiated planetesimals inferred from 26Al-26Mg chronometry

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 632, Issue 1, Pages L41-L44

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/497638

Keywords

astrochemistry; minor planets, asteroids; nuclear reactions; nucleosynthesis, abundances; solar system : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Constraining the timescales for the assembly and differentiation of planetary bodies in our young solar system is essential for a complete understanding of planet-forming processes. This is best achieved through the study of the daughter products of extinct radionuclides with short half-lives, as they provide unsurpassed time resolution as compared to long-lived chronometers. Here we report high-precision Mg isotope measurements of bulk samples of basalt, gabbro, and pyroxenite meteorites obtained by multiple-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). All samples from the eucrite and mesosiderite parent bodies (EPB and MPB) with suprachondritic Al/Mg ratios have resolvable Mg-26 excesses compared to matrix-matched samples from the Earth, the Moon, Mars, and chondrites. Basaltic magmatism on the EPB and MPB thus occurred during the life span of the now-extinct Al-26 nuclide. Initial Al-26/Al-27 values range from (1.26 +/- 0.37) x 10(-6) to (5.12 +/- 0.81) x 10(-6) at the time of magmatism on the EPB and MPB, and are among the highest Al-26 abundances reported for igneous meteorites. These results indicate that widespread silicate melting and differentiation of rocky bodies occurred within 3 million years of solar system formation, when Al-26 and Fe-60 were extant enough to induce planetesimal melting. Finally, thermal modeling constrains the accretion of these differentiated asteroids to within 1 million years of solar system formation, that is, prior to the accretion of chondrite parent bodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available