4.4 Article

The kinetics of ligand binding by an adenine-sensing riboswitch

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 40, Pages 13404-13414

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi051008u

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A riboswitch within the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the Bacillus subtilis pbuE mRNA binds adenine and related analogues in the absence of protein factors; excess adenine added to bacterial growth media triggers activation of a reporter gene that carries this riboswitch. To assess whether the riboswitch reaches thermodynamic equilibrium, or is operated by the kinetics of ligand binding and RNA transcription, we examined the detailed equilibrium and kinetic parameters for the complex formation between the aptamer domain of this riboswitch and the ligands adenine, 2-aminopurine (2AP), and 2,6-diaminopurine (DAP). Using a fluorescence-based assay, we have confirmed that adenine and 2AP have nearly equal binding affinity, with K-D values for 2AP ranging from 250 nM to 3 mu M at temperatures ranging from 15 to 35 degrees C, while DAP binds with much higher affinity. The association rate constant, however, favors adenine over DAP and 2AP by 3- and 10-fold, respectively, at 25 degrees C. Furthermore, the rate constants for adenine association and dissociation with the aptamer suggest that the pbuE riboswitch could be either kinetically or thermodynamically controlled depending upon the time scale of transcription and external variables such as temperature. We cite data that suggest kinetic control under certain conditions and illustrate with a model calculation how the system can switch between kinetic and equilibrium control. These findings further support the hypothesis that many riboswitches rely on the kinetics of ligand binding and the speed of RNA transcription, rather than simple ligand affinity, to establish the concentration of metabolite needed to trigger riboswitch function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available