4.8 Article

Phospho-dependent binding of the clathrin AP2 adaptor complex to GABAA receptors regulates the efficacy of inhibitory synaptic transmission

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506653102

Keywords

endocytosis; phosphorylation

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH118263] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS047478, R01 NS048045, R01 NS047478, R01 NS056359, R01 NS051195, NS048045, R21 NS103865] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy of synaptic inhibition depends on the number of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)Rs) expressed on the cell surface of neurons. The clathrin adaptor protein 2 (AP2) complex is a critical regulator of GABA(A)R endocytosis and, hence, surface receptor number. Here, we identify a previously uncharacterized atypical AP2 binding motif conserved within the intracellular domains of all GABA(A)R beta subunit isoforms. This AP2 binding motif (KTHLRRRSSQLK in the beta 3 subunit) incorporates the major sites of serine phosphorylation within receptor beta subunits, and phosphorylation within this site inhibits AP2 binding. Furthermore, by using surface plasmon resonance, we establish that a peptide (pep beta 3) corresponding to the AP2 binding motif in the GABA(A)R beta 3 subunit binds to AP2 with high affinity only when dephosphorylated. Moreover, the pep beta 3 peptide, but not its phosphorylated equivalent (pep beta 3-phos), enhanced the amplitude of miniature inhibitory synaptic current and whole cell GABA(A)R current. These effects of pep beta 3 on GABA(A)R current were occluded by inhibitors of dynamin-dependent endocytosis supporting an action of pep beta 3 on GABA(A)R endocytosis. Therefore phosphodependent regulation of AP2 binding to GABA(A)Rs provides a mechanism to specify receptor cell surface number and the efficacy of inhibitory synaptic transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available