4.4 Article

Cellulose acetate 1,2-benzenedicarboxylate protects against challenge with pathogenic X4 and R5 simian/human immunodeficiency virus

Journal

AIDS
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages 1587-1594

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000186020.24426.62

Keywords

cellulose acetate 1,2-benzenedicarboxylate; rhesus macaques; SHIV; mucosal challenge; X4 and R5 viruses

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD041761, P01 HD041761-020001, P01 HD41761] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To evaluate the protective efficacy of cellulose acetate 1,2-benzenedicarboxylate (CAP) formulated in a glycerol-based gel against infection with CXCR4 (X4) and CCR5 (R5) viruses in the simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)/rhesus macaque model of HIV-1 transmission. Design: Mucosal infection of non-human primates is a reasonable model for use in the investigation of HIV-1 intervention strategies. Methods: Rhesus macaques treated with Depo-Provera 5 weeks prior to challenge were inoculated intravaginally twice, over a period of 6 h with mixed inocula of pathogenic X4- and R5-SHIV in the presence or absence of CAP. Plasma viral load, peripheral and mucosal CD4 T cell counts as well as the genotype of the circulating virus were determined. Results: CAP protected seven often macaques against transmission of both X4- and R5-SHIV, reaching statistically significant values (P = 0.0256). Delayed and/or reduced virus replication, as well as blunting of peripheral and mucosal CD4 T cell loss was noted in the three macaques that were infected in the CAP treated group compared to those in the placebo group. Further, protection conferred by CAP appeared to be more effective against X4- than R5-SHIV infection. Conclusions: CAP is protective against highly permissive challenges with X4 and R5 viruses in vivo. Research on further development of this promising compound as a candidate microbicide for the prevention of sexual HIV-1 transmission is therefore warranted. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available