4.7 Article

The prevalence and correlates of nonaffective psychosis in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 58, Issue 8, Pages 668-676

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.034

Keywords

nonaffective psychosis; prevalence; epidemiology

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03 TW006481, R01 TW 006481, R03 TW006481-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA 016558, R01 DA016558-02, R01 DA016558, K05 DA015799] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH070884-01A2, U13 MH066849, R13 MH066849, R13 MH 066849, R13 MH066849-03, R01 MH070884, U01 MH 60220, R01 MH069864-02, U01 MH060220, U01 MH060220-04, R01 MH 069864, R01 MH069864] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To estimate, the Prevalence and correlates of clinician-diagnosed DSM-IV nonaffective Psychosis (NAP) in a national household survey. Methods: Data came from the United States National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). A screen for NAP was followed by blinded sub-sample clinical reappraisal interviews. Logistic regression was used to impute clinical diagnoses to respondents who were not re-interviewed. The method of Multiple Imputation (MI) was used to estimate prevalence and correlates. Results: Clinician-diagnosed NAP was well predicted by the screen (area under the curve [AUC] =.80). The M1 prevalence estimate of NAP (standard error in parentheses) is 5.0 (2.6) per 1000 population lifetime and 3.0 (2.2) per 1000 past 12 months. The vast majority (79.4%) of lifetime and 12-month (63.7%) cases met criteria for other DSM-IV hierarchy-free disorders. Fifthy-eight percent of 12-month cases were in treatment, most in the mental health specialty sector. Conclusions: The screen for NAP in the NCS-R greatly improved on previous epidemiological surveys in reducing false positives, but coding of open-ended screening scale responses was still needed to achieve accurate prediction. The lower prevalence estimate than in total-population incidence studies raises concerns that systematic nonresponse bias causes downward bias in survey prevalence estimates of NAP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available