4.7 Article

Improving the quality of coronary bypass surgery with intraoperative angiography - Validation of a new technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 1521-1525

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.081

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We report a comprehensive assessment and validation of a new intraoperative angiography technique. BACKGROUND Technical problems at the site of the distal anastomosis compromise an underappreciated proportion of coronary bypass grafts. The absence of a systematic, validated technique to verify graft patency in the operating room represents a significant breach in quality assurance. METHODS Fluorescent indocyanine green (ICG) dye is excited with dispersed laser light to create an angiographic depiction of the graft, native vessel, and anastomosis. One-hundred twenty patients underwent ICG angiography. Angiograms were reviewed for reliability and validity studies. RESULTS A total of 348 coronary bypass grafts were studied. Each ICG angiogram took 2.2 +/- 1.1 min to perform. The ICG angiography found 4.2% of patients had significant graft problems requiring major revision. Quality of visualization was rated according to a seven-point Likert scale (1 = worst, 7 = best). Among conduits, saphenous veins were best visualized (mean score standard deviation), 6.4 +/- 1.5 versus 5.5 +/- 1.9 for internal mammary arteries and 4.4 +/- 2.3 for radial arteries (p = 0.02). Location of distal anastomosis did not influence quality of visualization. There was high inter-rater reliability for graft revision (kappa = 1.0) and graft patency (kappa = 0.97) between surgeons. Sensitivity and specificity of the ICG angiograms for graft stenosis > 50% was 100% among 22 grafts also studied with X-ray angiography. CONCLUSIONS Information from ICG angiograms led to graft revisions for technical problems in 4.2% of patients that would have otherwise gone unrecognized. Intraoperative angiography is an emerging tool for improving the quality of coronary bypass surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available