4.7 Article

The survival of planetary nebulae in the intracluster medium

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 632, Issue 2, Pages 854-858

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/433183

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : clusters : individual (Virgo); galaxies : interactions; hydrodynamics; planetary nebulae : general; shock waves; stars : AGB and post-AGB; stars : winds,outflows

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stellar population stripped from galaxies in clusters evolves under the extreme conditions imposed by the intracluster (IC) medium. Intracluster stars generally suffer very high systemic velocities moving through a rarefied and extremely hot IC medium. We present numerical simulations that aim to explore the evolution and survival of IC asymptotic giant branch (AGB) envelopes and planetary nebula (PN) shells. Our models reflect the evolution of a low-mass star under the observed conditions in the Virgo IC medium. We find that the integrated hydrogen-recombination line emission of a PN is dominated by the inner dense shell, whose evolution is unaffected by the environment. Ram pressure stripping mainly affects the outermost IC PN shell, which hardly influences the emission when the PN is observed as a point source. More importantly, we find that a PN with progenitor mass of 1M(circle dot) fades to similar to 30% and similar to 10% of its maximum emission in 5000 and 10,000 yr, respectively, disclosing an actual PN lifetime (t(PN)) several times shorter than what is usually adopted (25,000 yr). This result affects the theoretical calculation of the luminosity-specific density of IC PNe, which scales with t(PN). For t(PN) 10,000 yr, our more conservative estimate, we obtain that the luminosity-specific density of PNe is in fair agreement with the value obtained from red giants. With our more realistic PN lifetime, we infer a fraction of IC starlight in the Virgo core of above 15%, which is higher than current estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available