4.7 Article

On the purification of α-cellulose from resinous wood for stable isotope (H, C and O) analysis

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 222, Issue 1-2, Pages 75-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.06.010

Keywords

stable isotopes; pine; resin; solvent extraction; infrared spectroscopy; cellulose; linked water

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B501504/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

alpha-Cellulose was isolated from four samples of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Each sample was divided into two portions. One portion had the resins removed by solvent extraction prior to removal of lignins by treatment with acidic sodium chlorite solution and treatment with sodium hydroxide solution to remove hemicelluloses. The other portion was processed in the same way apart from the solvent extraction step. The isolated wood constituents were characterised by attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FT-IR) spectroscopy. The infrared spectra of the resulting alpha-cellulose samples were identical indicating that treatment with acidic sodium chlorite and sodium hydroxide was sufficient to remove resins. The values of the stable isotope ratios (carbon, oxygen and hydrogen) for each pair of alpha-cellulose sub-samples also showed no significant differences within the reproducibility of the methods. The implication of these studies demonstrate that the customary step of resin extraction from pine is unnecessary if sodium chlorite and sodium hydroxide are used for the isolation of alpha-cellulose following the technique described in this paper. In addition, the study demonstrates that the oxygen isotope ratio of the water used for cellulose extraction does not influence the stable isotope values in the alpha-cellulose obtained. The importance of isotopic homogeneity within the cellulose sample is also highlighted.(c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available