4.6 Review

Two-stage exhumation of midcrustal arc rocks, Coast Mountains, British Columbia

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004TC001750

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New geologic data from the Central Gneiss Complex along Douglas Channel help delineate the burial and exhumation of the Late Cretaceous to Eocene Coast Mountains magmatic arc. Arc plutonism was on going between similar to 90 and 60 Ma, replaced by formation of dikes to 52 Ma. Supracrustal rocks were buried to midcrustal levels by 90 Ma, and garnet and kyanite grew from similar to 90 through 70 Ma. Subsequent exhumation was nearly isothermal and took place in two stages. The first occurred from similar to 70 to 59 Ma as the arc contracted obliquely and sillimanite replaced kyanite. Exhumation was slow (similar to 0.5 mm/yr), probably accomplished by erosion aided by coaxial crustal thinning. Exhumation rates about doubled in the second stage of exhumation, after 59 Ma and before similar to 52 Ma. Penetrative deformation ended prior to intrusion of the Quottoon pluton at 59 Ma and similar to 6.5 kbar. Production of cordierite rims on garnet at 4.5 kbar and similar to 700 degrees C signaled the end of near-isothermal decompression prior to 52 Ma. Rapid cooling (100 degrees C/10(6) years) of the Central Gneiss Complex followed cordierite growth; temperatures dropped to similar to 250 degrees by similar to 48 Ma. The increase in exhumation rate and the subsequent rapid cooling are attributed to excision of >6 km of crust on a detachment system on the northeastern side of the Central Gneiss Complex. Comparison to other parts of the Coast Mountains arc, the Sierra Nevada, and Fiordland, New Zealand, shows that the amount and tempo of exhumation vary greatly within and between arcs, suggesting that the processes accommodating exhumation vary significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available