4.7 Article

Humanized θ-Defensins (Retrocyclins) Enhance Macrophage Performance and Protect Mice from Experimental Anthrax Infections

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 4238-4250

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00267-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSTO-CBD/DTRA [1.1A0010-07-RDB]
  2. German Ministry of Defense [E/UR3G/5G002/5A800]
  3. NIH [RO1-AI070726]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retrocyclins are humanized versions of the theta-defensin peptides expressed by the leukocytes of several nonhuman primates. Previous studies, performed in serum-free media, determined that retrocyclins 1 (RC1) and RC2 could prevent successful germination of Bacillus anthracis spores, kill vegetative B. anthracis cells, and inactivate anthrax lethal factor. We now report that retrocyclins are extensively bound by components of native mouse, human, and fetal calf sera, that heat-inactivated sera show greatly enhanced retrocyclin binding, and that native and (especially) heat-inactivated sera greatly reduce the direct activities of retrocyclins against spores and vegetative cells of B. anthracis. Nevertheless, we also found that retrocyclins protected mice challenged in vivo by subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or intranasal instillation of B. anthracis spores. Retrocyclin 1 bound extensively to B. anthracis spores and enhanced their phagocytosis and killing by murine RAW264.7 cells. Based on the assumption that spore-bound RC1 enters phagosomes by piggyback phagocytosis, model calculations showed that the intraphagosomal concentration of RC1 would greatly exceed its extracellular concentration. Murine alveolar macrophages took up fluorescently labeled retrocyclin, suggesting that macrophages may also acquire extracellular RC1 directly. Overall, these data demonstrate that retrocyclins are effective in vivo against experimental murine anthrax infections and suggest that enhanced macrophage function contributes to this property.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available