4.2 Article

Hypoxic alterations of cortisol circadian rhythm in man after simulation of a long duration flight

Journal

STEROIDS
Volume 70, Issue 12, Pages 803-810

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2005.05.003

Keywords

aerospace medicine; hypobaric hypoxia; pressurised cabins; circadian rhythms; cortisol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fatigue is often reported after long duration flights. Mild hypobaric hypoxia caused by pressurisation may be involved in this effect through disruption of circadian rhythms, independently of the number of time zones crossed. In this controlled crossover study, we assessed the effects of two levels of hypoxia equivalent to 8000 and 12,000 ft on the circadian rhythm of plasma cortisol, a marker of the circadian time structure. Sixteen healthy young male volunteers (23-39 years) were exposed in a hypobaric chamber for 8 h (08:00-16:00 h) to 8000 ft, followed 4 weeks later to 12,000 ft. Plasma cortisol was assayed during two 24-h cycles (control and hypoxic exposure) every 2 h in all subjects. We found a significant change in the pattern of cortisol secretion during both hypoxic exposures, with an initial fall in cortisol followed by a transient rebound, whereas the phase and the 24-h mean level remained unchanged. The change in cortisol pattern followed the alterations in autonomic balance assessed by heart rate variability (IIRV) spectral analysis. The normalised high frequencies and the low-to-high frequencies ratio showed a significant shift toward sympathetic dominance with some differences in time course for both altitudes studied. HRV analysis improved the interpretation of cortisol 24-h profiles. Our data, which strongly suggest that prolonged mild hypoxia alters the expression of cortisol circadian rhythm, should be taken into account to interpret secretory rhythm changes after transmeridian flights. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available