4.7 Article

Staphylococcus capitis endocarditis due to a transvenous endocardial pacemaker infection:: Case report and review of Staphylococcus capitis endocarditis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 335-339

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.08.004

Keywords

Staphylococus capitis; endocarditis; pacemaker infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Newer microbiologic methods to determine the species of coagutase-negative staphylococci (CONS) have evolved which have shown that most endocarditis due to CONS is caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis, and far fewer by Staphylococcus warneri and Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Methods: The recent opportunity to successfully treat a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus capitis endocarditis secondary to an infected transvenous pacemaker led to a review of the literature relating to S. capitis endocarditis. Results: Thirteen previously recorded patients were identified. Twelve (86%) patients were mate. Ten had endocarditis associated with a native valve, two with prosthetic valves and one with a transvenous pacemaker. Mortality was Low in all 14 cases (including this case report) with only two deaths; one in a patient with a native valve and the other with a prosthetic valve. Four of the isolates were methicillin resistant but sensitive to vancomycin, which was used in the treatment of eight patients. Those patients with prosthetic cardiac devices appear to do better when the devices are surgically removed. Conclusions: CoNS as a cause of endocarditis appears to be increasing and the current ability to determine the species of these organisms should elicit the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and biomolecular mechanisms involved in the induction of valvular disease. (c) 2005 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available