4.6 Article

Pattern recognition molecules activated by Chlamydia muridarum infection of cloned murine oviduct epithelial cell lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 9, Pages 6065-6075

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.6065

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted disease in the United States and a major cause of female infertility due to infection-induced Fallopian tube scarring. Epithelial cells are likely central to host defense and pathophysiology as they are the principal cell type productively infected by C trachomatis. We generated cloned murine oviduct epithelial cell lines without viral or chemical transformation to investigate the role of the TLRs and cytosolic nucleotide binding site/leucine-rich repeat proteins Nod1 and Nod2 in epithelial responses to Chlamydia muridarum infection. RT-PCR assays detected mRNA for TLR2 (TLRs 1 and 6), TLR3, and TLR5. No mRNA was detected for TLRs 4, 7, 8, and 9. Messenger RNAs for Nod1 and Nod2 were present in the epithelial cell lines. Oviduct epithelial cell lines infected with C. muridarum or exposed to the TLR2 agonist peptidoglycan secreted representative acute phase cytokines IL-6 and GM-CSF in a MyD88-dependent fashion. Infected epithelial cell lines secreted the immunomodulatory cytokine IFN-beta, even though C. muridarum does not have a clear pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) for triggering IFN-beta transcription. The oviduct epithelial lines did not secrete IFN-beta in response to the TLR2 agonist peptidoglycan or to the TLR3 agonist poly(I:C). Our data identify TLR2 as the principal TLR responsible for secretion of acute phase cytokines by C. muridarum-infected oviduct epithelial cell lines. The pattern recognition molecule responsible for infection-induced IFN-beta secretion by oviduct epithelial cells remains to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available