4.7 Article

Impact of HIF-1α and HIF-2α on proliferation and migration of human pulmonary artery fibroblasts in hypoxia

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages 163-+

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-4104fje

Keywords

adventitia; alpha-smooth-muscle actin; remodeling; RNA interference

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proliferation of adventitial fibroblasts of small intrapulmonary arteries ( FBPA) has been disclosed as an early event in the development of pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale in response to hypoxia. We investigated the role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) in human FBPA exposed to hypoxia. Primary cultures of FBPA displayed a strong mitogenic response to 24 h hypoxia, whereas the rate of apoptosis was significantly suppressed. In addition, the migration of FBPA was strongly increased under hypoxic conditions but not the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin. Hypoxia induced a marked up-regulation ( protein level) of both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha, alongside with nuclear translocation of these transcription factors. Specific inhibition of either HIF-1 alpha or HIF-2 alpha was achieved by RNA interference technology, as proven by HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha mRNA and protein analysis and expression analysis of HIF downstream target genes. With the use of this approach, the hypoxia-induced proliferative response of the FBPA was found to be solely HIF-2 alpha dependent, whereas the migratory response was significantly reduced by both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha interference. In conclusion, HIF up-regulation is essential for hypoxic cellular responses in human pulmonary artery adventitial fibroblasts such as proliferation and migration, mimicking the pulmonary hypertensive phenotype in vivo. Differential HIF subtype dependency was noted, with HIF-2 alpha playing a predominant role, which may offer future intervention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available