4.5 Article

Geographical inequalities in nutrient status and risk of malnutrition among English people aged 65 y and older

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 21, Issue 11-12, Pages 1100-1106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2005.03.005

Keywords

inequalities; malnutrition; nutrients; elderly; screening; malnutrition universal screening tool

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Geographical inequalities in health continue to be a problem within developed countries. This study investigated whether there were north-south geographical inequalities among older people living in England with respect to risk of protein-energy malnutrition and status of nutrients, particularly those derived from fruit and vegetables. Methods: A secondary analysis of data collected prospectively by the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 y and older was undertaken to assess geographical prevalence of risk of protein-energy malnutrition (1155 subjects) and nutrient status (881 to 1046 subjects). Results: A north-south gradient was found in risk of protein-energy malnutrition (19.4%, 12.3%, and 11.2% in the northern, central, and southern regions, respectively; P = 0.013, P for trend = 0.002). This was accompanied by a north-south gradient in the status of vitamin C (30, 38, and 46 mu mol/L in the respective regions, P < 0.001), which was associated with deficiency (< 11 mu mol/L) in a third of subjects in the northern region, a range of carotenoids (P = 0.023 to < 0.001), vitamin D (P < 0.001), and selenium (P < 0.001). These inequalities were accompanied by gradients in indices of health status and socioeconomic status, which could account only partly for the geographical inequalities. Circulating vitamin C and carotenoid concentrations were related to the intake of fruit and vegetables. Conclusions: This study suggests there is a north-south divide in the risk of protein-energy malnutrition and a range of nutrients, which have been implicated in the development of common chronic diseases. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available