4.7 Article

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Urtoxazumab, a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody, against Shiga-Like Toxin 2 in Healthy Adults and in Pediatric Patients Infected with Shiga-Like Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 239-243

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00343-09

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundamental Studies in Health Science of the Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research of Japan
  2. Research and Development Promotion of Orphan Drugs, NIBIO (Japan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection causes diarrhea, which is often bloody and which can result in potentially life-threatening hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). Urtoxazumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the Shiga-like toxin 2 (Stx2) produced by STEC, has been developed as a promising agent for the prevention of HUS. Single randomized, intravenous, double-blind, placebo-controlled doses of urtoxazumab were administered to assess its safety and pharmacokinetics in healthy adults (0.1 to 3.0 mg/kg of body weight) and STEC-infected pediatric patients (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg). No dose-related safety trends were noted, nor were antiurtoxazumab antibodies detected. The disposition of urtoxazumab showed a biexponential decline, regardless of the dose. In healthy adults, the mean terminal elimination half-life was consistent across the dose groups and ranged from 24.6 days (3.0-mg/kg dose group) to 28.9 days (0.3-mg/kg dose group). The mean maximum serum drug concentration (C-max) ranged from 2.6 mu g/ml at 0.1 mg/kg to 71.7 mu g/ml at 3.0 mg/kg. The disposition of urtoxazumab following the administration of doses of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg in pediatric patients showed mean C(max)s of 19.6 and 56.1 mu g/ml, respectively. Urtoxazumab was well tolerated, appears to be safe at doses of up to 3.0 mg/kg, and is a potential candidate for the prevention of HUS in pediatric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available