4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Quantifying the effect of posture on intracranial physiology in humans by MRI flow studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 591-596

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20427

Keywords

cine phase contrast; upright postured CSF flow; CBF; cerebral venous outflow; intracranial compliance and pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To quantify the effect of posture on intracranial physiology in humans by MRI, and demonstrate the relationship between intracranial compliance (ICC) and pressure (ICP). and the pulsatility of blood and CSF flows. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy volunteers (29 +/- 7 years old) were scanned in the supine and sitting positions using a vertical gap MRI scanner. Pulsatile blood and CSF flows into and out from the brain were visualized and quantified using time-of-flight (TOF) and clue phase-contrast techniques. respectively. The total cerebral blood flow (tCBF), venous outflow. ICC, and ICP for the two postures were then calculated from the arterial. venous, and CSF volumetric flow rate waveforms using a previously described method. Results: In the upright posture, venous outflow is considerably less pulsatile (57%) and occurs predominantly through the vertebral plexus, while in the supine posture venous outflow occurs predominantly through the internal jugular veins. A slightly lower tCBF (12%), a considerably smaller CSF volume oscillating between the cranium and the spinal canal (48%). and a much larger ICC (2.8-fold) with a corresponding decrease in the MRI-derived ICP values were measured in the sitting position. Conclusion: The effect of posture on intracranial physiology can be quantified by MRI because posture-related changes in ICC and ICP strongly affect the dynamics of cerebral blood and CSF flows. This study provides important insight into the coupling that exists between arterial, venous, and CSF flow dynamics. and how it is affected by posture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available