Journal
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN
Volume 16, Issue 1-2, Pages 42-56Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-004-0057-5
Keywords
multi-criteria decision-making; Arrow's theorem; multi-attribute preference theory; evaluation methods
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Arrow's theorem poses limits to the translation of the different preference orders on a set of options into a single preference order. In this paper, I argue, against opinions to the contrary, that Arrow's theorem applies fully to multi-criteria decision problems as they occur in engineering design, making solution methods to such problems subject to the theorem's negative result. Discussing the meaning and consequences for engineering design, I review the solution methods to such problems presented in the engineering design literature in the light of the theorem. It appears that underlying such methods is a mix-up of two fundamentally different problem definitions, as the theory of multi-attribute preferences, which is often presented as an adequate approach for engineering design, in fact fails to address the Arrowian multi-criteria problem. Finally, I suggest ways how engineering design might adopt results from discussions of Arrow's theorem elsewhere in resolving its multi-criteria decision problems.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available