4.7 Article

The association between HLA DR, DQ antigens, and vulval lichen sclerosus in the UK: HLA DRB1*12 and its associated DRB1*12/DQB1*0301/04/091010 haplotype confers susceptibility to vulval lichen sclerosus, and HLA DRB1*0301104 and its associated DRB1*0301/04/DQB1*0201/02/03 haplotype protects from vulval lichen sclerosus

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 5, Pages 895-899

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23905.x

Keywords

genotyping; HLA-DQ; HLA-DR; lichen sclerosus; susceptibility

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is considered to have an immunogenetic background. Several small studies, using serological typing, have reported that HLA-DR11, DR12, and DQ7 were increased in LS, with DR17 less frequent. This study aimed to validate and detect new HLA-DR and DQ associations with LS in females and its characteristic clinical parameters. The cases, 187 female LS patients, and 354 healthy controls were all UK North Europeans. PCR-sequence specific primers method was applied to genotype the HLA-DR, DQ polymorphisms that correspond to 17 serologically defined DR and seven DQ antigens. Statistical analysis was performed with two-tailed Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni adjustment (p value after Bonferrroni adjustment, Pc). We found increased frequency of DRB1*12 (DR12) (11.2% vs 2.5%, pc<0.01) and the haplotype DRB1*12/DQB1*0301/04/09/010 (11.2% vs 2.5%, p < 0.001, pc < 0.05), and a lower frequency of DRB1*0301/04 (DR17) (11.8% vs 25.8%, pc < 0.01) and the haplotype DRB1*03/DQB1*02DRB1*0301/DQB1*0201/02/03 (11.2% vs 24.6%, pc < 0.0001) in patients compared with controls. HLA DR and DQ antigens were not associated with time of onset of disease, site of involvement, structural changes of genitals, and response to treatment with potent topical steroids. In conclusion, HLA-DR and DQ antigens or their haplotypes appear to be involved in both susceptibility to and protection from LS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available