4.4 Article

Effects of ketamine on prefrontal and striatal regions in an overt verbal fluency task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 92-102

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0154-9

Keywords

ketamine; N-methyl-D-aspartate; NMDA; schizophrenia; verbal fluency; executive function; functional magnetic resonance imaging; fMRI

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Glutamatergic dysfunction at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been proposed as a neurochemical model for schizophrenia. A key feature of this disorder is impairments in cognitive function. Objective: The present study sought to investigate the effects of ketamine, an NMDA antagonist, on the performance and neural correlates of verbal fluency, a task that engages executive function. Methods: Ten healthy dextral male volunteers received intravenous placebo normal saline or ketamine (bolus of 0.23 mg/kg and infusion of 0.65 mg/kg), administered in a double-blind, randomized order, during two functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions. During scanning, subjects performed a verbal fluency task. Two levels of cognitive load were examined in the task, and overt responses were acquired in order to measure subject performance on-line. Results: Ketamine induced symptoms in the healthy individuals comparable to an acute psychotic state. Although ketamine did not significantly impair task performance relative to placebo, an interaction of task demand with ketamine was observed in the anterior cingulate, prefrontal, and striatal regions. Conclusions: The behavioural and functional effects of ketamine during verbal fluency in healthy individuals were comparable to those evident in patients with schizophrenia. The findings support a role for glutamatergic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available