4.7 Article

Penetration of chlorhexidine into human skin

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 3633-3636

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00637-08

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC CASE [CNA/05/09]
  2. Insight Health Ltd., United Kingdom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated a model of skin permeation to determine the depth of delivery of chlorhexidine into full-thickness excised human skin following topical application of 2% (wt/vol) aqueous chlorhexidine digluconate. Skin permeation studies were performed on full-thickness human skin using Franz diffusion cells with exposure to chlorhexidine for 2 min, 30 min, and 24 h. The concentration of chlorhexidine extracted from skin sections was determined to a depth of 1,500 mu m following serial sectioning of the skin using a microtome and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography. Poor penetration of chlorhexidine into skin following 2-min and 30-min exposures to chlorhexidine was observed (0.157 +/- 0.047 and 0.077 +/- 0.015 mu g/mg tissue within the top 100 mu m), and levels of chlorhexidine were minimal at deeper skin depths (less than 0.002 mu g/mg tissue below 300 mu m). After 24 h of exposure, there was more chlorhexidine within the upper 100-mu m sections (7.88 +/- 1.37 mu g/mg tissue); however, the levels remained low (less than 1 mu g/mg tissue) at depths below 300 mu m. There was no detectable penetration through the full-thickness skin. The model presented in this study can be used to assess the permeation of antiseptic agents through various layers of skin in vitro. Aqueous chlorhexidine demonstrated poor permeation into the deeper layers of the skin, which may restrict the efficacy of skin antisepsis with this agent. This study lays the foundation for further research in adopting alternative strategies for enhanced skin antisepsis in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available