4.5 Article

Methylene- and ether-linked liquid crystal dimers II. Effects of mesogenic linking unit and terminal chain length

Journal

LIQUID CRYSTALS
Volume 32, Issue 11-12, Pages 1499-1513

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678290500284983

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four series of liquid crystal dimers have been prepared containing either ether-linked or methylene-linked spacers. Changing the spacer from being ether-linked, i.e. O(CH2)(n)O, to methylene-linked, i.e. (CH2)(n+2), results in decreased nematic-isotropic transition temperatures, and this reduction is more pronounced for odd-membered spacers. By contrast, the entropy change associated with the nematic-isotropic transition is higher for an evenmembered methylene-linked dimer than for the corresponding ether-linked material. This trend is reversed for odd members. These observations are completely in accord with the predictions of a theoretical model developed by Luckhurst and co-workers in which the only difference between the dimers is their shape. For the highly non-linear pentamethylene-linked dimers, only those with a short terminal chain exhibited fluid smectic behaviour, specifically, a monotropic alternating SmC structure which allowed for the efficient packing of the bent molecules. Once the terminal chain reached a value of m=9, a modulated ordered smectic phase was observed. For even-membered dimers, which exhibit only nematic phases upon melting for short terminal chain lengths, smectic phase behaviour was promoted with increasing terminal chain length, as is conventionally observed. Even-membered ether-linked dimers exhibited a SmC phase whereas even-membered methylene-linked dimers exhibited an ordered smectic G/J phase. Thus, it would appear that the differences in the transitional properties of ether- and methylene-linked dimers can be accounted for largely in terms of geometrical factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available