4.7 Article

Multinormal In Vitro Distribution Model Suitable for the Distribution of Plasmodium falciparum Chemosusceptibility to Doxycycline

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 688-695

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00546-08

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Delegation Generale pour l'Armement
  2. Direction Centrale du Service de Sante des Armees [06CO009]
  3. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Regional [APHM 2003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution and range of 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)s) of doxycycline were determined for 747 isolates obtained between 1997 and 2006 from patients living in Senegal, Republic of the Congo, and Gabon and patients hospitalized in France for imported malaria. The statistical analysis was designed to answer the specific question of whether Plasmodium falciparum has different phenotypes of susceptibility to doxycycline. A triple normal distribution was fitted to the data using a Bayesian mixture modeling approach. The IC50 geometric mean ranged from 6.2 mu M to 11.1 mu M according to the geographical origin, with a mean of 9.3 mu M for all 747 parasites. The values for all 747 isolates were classified into three components: component A, with an IC50 mean of 4.9 mu M (+/- 2.1 mu M [standard deviation]); component B, with an IC50 mean of 7.7 mu M (+/- 1.2 mu M); and component C, with an IC50 mean of 17.9 mu M (+/- 1.4 mu M). According to the origin of the P. falciparum isolates, the triple normal distribution was found in each subgroup. However, the proportion of isolates predicted to belong to component B was most important in isolates from Gabon and Congo and in isolates imported from Africa ( from 46 to 56%). In Senegal, 55% of the P. falciparum isolates were predicted to be classified as component C. The cutoff of reduced susceptibility to doxycycline in vitro was estimated to be 35 mu M.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available