4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Silent adenoma subtype 3 of the pituitary - Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural classification: A review of 29 cases

Journal

ULTRASTRUCTURAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 511-524

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01913120500323514

Keywords

cell derivation; pituitary adenoma; rostral thyrotroph; treatment ultrastructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The silent adenoma subtype 3 (SAS-3) Of undetermined cellular derivation is a seemingly nonfunctioning aggressive pituitary tumor with a high recurrence rate. At the time of diagnosis SAS-3s are macro- or giant adenomas particularly aggressive in young individuals, especially women. They are usually associated with mild hyperprolactinemia and are unremarkable by histology. Immunohistochemistry, demonstrating scattered immunoreactivity mostly for GH, PRL, TSH, and alpha-subunit, is not diagnostic. Presently, only TEM permits conclusive diagnosis. Ultrastructurally, the large polar adenoma cells contain abundant RER, masses of SER, extensive multipolar Golgi apparatus,. and unevenly clustered mitochondria, displaced by RER and SER, which may show close spatial relationship to RER. Cell membranes often form plexiform interdigitations. Nuclear pleomorphism and nuclear inclusions are common. The 100- to 200-nm secretory granules accumulate heavily in cell processes, which is a hallmark of glycoprotein hormone cell differentiation. The endothelial cells may contain tubuloreticular inclusions. Complete surgical removal of the large often invasive tumors is difficult necessitating postoperative treatment. SAS-3 is sensitive to conventional radiation. Some tumors express somatostatin receptors and respond well to somatostatin analogues, offering long-term control in patients with residual tumor. Possible derivation of SAS-3 from rostral thyrotrophs, a cell type presently known in rodents is comtemplated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available