4.6 Article

Fluoride release from aged resin composites containing fluoridated glass filler

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1033-1038

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.008

Keywords

aging; fluoride release; giomer; glass-ionomer; resin composite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluoride release from aged resin composites containing different types of fluoridated glass filter into both deionized distilled water and lactic acid sotution. Methods: Three resin composites, UniFil S (containing fluoro-alumino-silicate glass filter), Reactmer (containing pre-reacted glass-ionomer filter) and Beautifil (containing both types of filters) were used. A conventional glass-ionomer cement, Ketac-Fit, was used as a controt. Five disk specimens of each material were prepared and aged in water for 10 weeks. After aging, specimens were immersed in deionized distilled water for a further 6 days and then in aqueous tactic acid (pH 4.0) for 2 days. This process was repeated twice more and the specimens were subsequently immersed in water for a further 12 days. Fluoride release was measured every 2 days throughout the post-aging period. Results: The amount of fluoride release for aged UniFil S and Beautifil markedly increased in acid solution compared with water storage. The difference was not so great for aged Reactmer and Ketac-Fil. UniFit S and Beautifil gave significantly greater fluoride release in water following immersion in acid solution (p< 0.05, two-way ANOVA and Scheffe's test), but Reactmer and Ketac-Fil showed no such increase in fluoride release after acid immersion. Significance: These results suggested that the nature of the fluoridated glass filter within a resin composite and the way in which the material interacts with an acidic environment affected the amount of fluoride released. (c) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available