4.8 Article

Antibiotic resistance in exopolysaccharide-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from orthopaedic implant infections

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 33, Pages 6530-6535

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.031

Keywords

Staphylococcus epidermidis; antibiotic resistance; methicillin; aminoglycosides; biofilm; implant infections

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis is able to produce biofilm and to frequently Cause implant infections. In recent years, it has also exhibited an increasing antimicrobial drug resistance. Here, the resistance to a panel of 16 different antibiotics in 342 clinical strains of S. epidermidis from orthopaedic implant infections has been investigated. The isolates were pheno- and genotyped for extracellular polysaccharide production, relevant to staphylococcal biofilm formation. in order to ascertain possible associations with antibiotic resistance. Approximately 10% of the isolates were found to be sensitive to all screened antibiotics. In all, 37 38%, were resistant to beta-lactams such as oxacillin and imipenem, while the resistance to penicillin. ampicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole. was consistently observed in over 80% of the strains. Erythromycin- and clindamycin- resistant strains were approximately 41% and 16%, respectively. Of the isolates, 10% was resistant to chloramphenicol, 23% to sulfamethoxazole and 26% to ciprofloxacin, Resistance to vancomycin was never observed. Interestingly, exopolysaccharide-producing strains exhibited a significantly higher prevalence in the resistance to the four aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin. netilmicin. tobramycin). to sulfamethoxazole and to ciprofloxacin with respect to non-producing isolates. Moreover, multiple resistance to antibiotics was more frequent aniong exopolysaccharide-forming strains. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available