4.5 Article

Modeling past and future alpine permafrost distribution in the Colorado Front Range

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 1495-1508

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1205

Keywords

permafrost; Front Range; climate change; rock glaciers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rock glaciers, a feature associated with at least discontinuous permafrost, provide important topoclimatic information. Active and inactive rock glaciers can be used to model current permafrost distribution. Relict rock glacier locations provide paleoclimatic information to infer past conditions. Future warmer climates could cause permafrost zones to shrink and initiate slope instability hazards such as debris flows or rockslides, thus modeling change remains imperative. This research examines potential past and future permafrost distribution in the Colorado Front Range by calibrating an existing permafrost model using a standard adiabatic rate for mountains (0.5 degrees C per 100 m) for a 4 degrees C range of cooler and warmer temperatures. According to the model, permafrost currently covers about 12 per cent (326.1 km(2)) of the entire study area (2721.5 km(2)). In a 4 degrees C cooler climate 73.7 per cent (2004.4 km(2)) of the study area could be covered by permafrost, whereas in a VC warmer climate almost no permafrost would be found. Permafrost would be reduced severely by 93.9 per cent (a loss of 306.2 km(2)) in a 2.0 degrees C warmer climate; however, permafrost will likely respond slowly to change. Relict rock glacier distribution indicates that mean annual air temperature (MAAT) was once at least some 3.0 to 4.0 degrees C cooler during the Pleistocene, with permafrost extending some 600-700 m lower than today. The model is effective at identify ing temperature sensitive areas for future monitoring; however, other feedback mechanisms such as precipitation are neglected. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available