4.3 Review

Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 4677-4681

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12773

Keywords

Extraperitoneal; transperitoneal; lymphadenectomy; minimally invasive; gynecological malignancies; meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is established as a standard procedure for disease staging and management of patients with advanced cervical, ovarian and high-risk endometrial cancer. Our meta-analysis accumulated the current evidence on the impact of transperitoneal (TLL) and extraperitoneal (ELL) laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for the management of patients with gynecological malignancies. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was undertaken for articles published up to April 2018. Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis and comprised a total of 608 women. ELL was associated with significantly shorter operative times for lymphadenectomy, whereas total operative times were not different between the two groups. Significantly increased intraoperative complications were found in the TLL group. Conclusion: ELL is safe and efficient with outcomes comparable to TLL in terms of lymph node yield and improved operative outcomes with regard to lymphadenectomy times and intraoperative complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available