4.4 Article

An inverse relationship between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and allergic airway inflammation in an allergen challenge model

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages 468-473

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61173-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) expression has not been evaluated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells from allergic asthmatic patients. Objective: To determine whether inappropriate down-regulation of PPAR-gamma in alveolar macrophages may contribute to persistent airway inflammation in allergic asthma. Methods: We used segmental allergen challenge as a model of in vivo experimental allergic asthmatic exacerbation and airway inflammation. PPAR-gamma gene expression was evaluated at baseline and 24 hours later in asthmatic patients and controls using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunofluorescence was used to determine cellular location of the PPAR-gamma protein. Results: We demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge that PPAR-gamma messenger RNA and protein, which are highly expressed in alveolar macrophages of healthy individuals, are significantly reduced in asthmatic patients after segmental allergen challenge. In allergic asthmatic patients (n = 9), PPAR-gamma gene expression decreased significantly from baseline to postchallenge BAL (median decrease, 45%; P = .008). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that PPAR-gamma protein was associated with alveolar macrophages and not with inflammatory eosinophils and neutrophils. Conclusion: Results implicate down-regulation of PPAR-gamma in BAL cells as a potential factor in dysregulation of lung homeostasis in asthmatic patients. The present findings suggest that PPAR-gamma agonists could have a future role in asthma therapy and warrant further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available