4.7 Article

Support for 2 variants of eczema

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages 1067-1072

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.06.038

Keywords

eczema; atopiclextrinsic; nonatopiclintrinsic; risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies investigating the natural history and risk factors for eczema have historically considered eczema as a single entity, without regard for the individual's atopic status. The association between atopy and eczema is complex, and as many as (2)/(3) of patients with eczema are not atopic. Objective: To investigate the risk factors for eczema in relation to the child's atopic status in a cohort of high-risk children. Methods: A prospective birth cohort of 263 children was followed for 5 years and closely examined for eczema. Antenatal and postnatal data on environmental exposures were collected by interview. Skin prick test to define atopic status was performed at 6 months and 2 and 5 years of age. Results: Of the subjects, 66.1% had eczema in the first 5 years, and the majority, (85.5%) reported onset of rash in the first year. A third of those with eczema were not atopic (nonatopic/intrinsic eczema). Children with atopic eczema (extrinsic eczema) were more likely to he male, to have been breast-fed longer, and to have a history of food allergies, allergic rhinitis, and current wheeze. Nonatopic eczema was more common in girls, and an association was found with early daycare attendance. Conclusion: This study supports the presence of 2 variants of eczema: atopic eczema occurring early in childhood and nonatopic eczema with early daycare attendance. It is likely that environmental factors have a different effect on these 2 variants of eczema, and future studies should thus consider eczema as 2 variants in determining the effect of attributable risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available