4.7 Article

Administration route- and immune cell activation-dependent tumor eradication by IL12 electrotransfer

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 942-949

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.03.037

Keywords

administration route; IL-12; gene therapy; electroporation; electrotransfer; T cells

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA98928] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R21 DE14682] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injection of DNA via electric pulses into targeted tissues is referred to as electrotransfer. Intratumoral electrotransfer of the IL12 gene is more effective than intramuscular electrotransfer of the same gene in the eradication of established tumors. To understand the underlying immunological mechanisms, T cell infiltration, CTL activity, inhibition of angiogenesis, and transgene expression were analyzed using immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-based CTL analysis, Northern blot, and ELISA. In addition, the therapeutic effects of IL12 gene therapy were determined in immunocompetent, immune-cell-depleted, and immunodeficient mice. We found that intratumoral, but not intramuscular, electrotransfer of the IL12 gene induces CD8(+) T cell infiltration, CTL activity, and tumor eradication. Tumor eradication by intratumoral IL12 gene electrotransfer requires both NK and T cells. The absence of either cell type will abrogate the intratumoral IL12 gene therapy-induced tumor eradication. Such a requirement explains why tumors cannot be eradicated by intramuscular electrotransfer of the IL12 gene. Only NK-cell-dependent, and not T-cell-dependent, anti-tumor effects are induced by intramuscular administration. Together, these results suggest that NK cells play an important role in both administration routes, mediating tumor growth inhibition, but T cells are specifically activated by intratumoral IL12 gene electrotransfer and not by the intramuscular route.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available