4.5 Article

Correlations between the pour point/gel point and the amount of precipitated wax for waxy crudes

Journal

PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 11-12, Pages 1313-1322

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1081/LFT-200038167

Keywords

waxy crude; pour point; gel point; precipitated wax; correlation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amount of precipitated wax is one of the key factors that governs the flow properties of waxy crudes. Experimental results of 24 crudes have shown that approximately 2 wt% precipitated wax is sufficient to cause a virgin waxy crude gelling. Accordingly, a correlation between the pour point and the temperature at which 2 wt% of wax has precipitated out from a crude oil; i.e.. T-c(2 wt%), and a correlation between the gel point and Tc(2 wt%) have been developed. The proposed correlation of the pour point is in accordance with the correlation developed by Letoffe et al. (1995) on the basis of 14 crudes from eight countries. The development of the gel point correlation and further verification of the pour point correlation indicate that there is a relationship between the gelling of virgin waxy crudes and the amount of precipitated wax. According to these correlations and the amount of precipitated wax, which can be determined only with a little sample by thermodynamic models or Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) experiment, the get point and pour point of virgin waxy crude can be predicted even if the oil sample is very limited. Heat treatment and chemical treatment can greatly improve How behavior of waxy crudes, and more precipitated wax is present when the beneficiated (thermally beneficiated or PPD-beneficiated) crude oils gel. Experimental results showed that approximately two or three times the amount of precipitated wax presents at the gelling temperature when the oils were in their beneficiated (thermally beneficiated or PPD-beneficiated) conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available