4.7 Article

High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying sulfonylurea herbicides in human urine: reconsidering the validation process

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 383, Issue 6, Pages 963-976

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-005-0099-1

Keywords

validation; sulfonyl urea; mass spectrometry; urine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a method for measuring 17 sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides in human urine. Urine samples were extracted using solid phase extraction (SPE), preconcentrated, and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using turboionspray atmospheric pressure ionization. Carbon 13-labeled ethametsulfuron methyl was used as an internal standard. Chromatographic retention times were under 7 minutes. Total throughput was estimated as > 100 samples per day. Because only one labeled internal standard was available for the analysis, we were forced to reconsider and restructure the validation process to include stringent stability tests and analyses of urine matrices of differing compositions. We describe our restructured validation process and the critical evaluation it provides for the method developed. The limits of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.05 mu g/L to 0.10 mu g/L with an average LOD of 0.06 mu g/L. Average total relative standard deviations were 17%, 12% and 8% at 0.1 mu g/L, 3.0 mu g/L and 10 mu g/L, respectively. Average extraction efficiencies of the SPE cartridges were 87% and 86% at 2.5 mu g/L and 25 mu g/L, respectively. Chemical degradation in acetonitrile and urine was monitored over 250 days. Estimated days for 10% and 50% degradation in urine and acetonitrile ranged from 0.7 days to > 318 days. The influence of matrix effects on precision and accuracy was also explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available