4.5 Article

Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?

Journal

OIKOS
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 279-290

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available