4.1 Review

Event-related potentials in cocaine-exposed children during a Stroop task

Journal

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 797-813

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.05.011

Keywords

prenatal cocaine exposure; cortical maturation; event-related potential

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR06022] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01HD17860, P01-HD03008] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [R01-DA-06025, R01 DADA017863, K02-DA00222] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [R215K000023] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Prenatal cocaine-exposure may interfere with the ontogeny of prefrontal cortical executive functions due to cocaine's effect on the developing monoaminergic system. This study presents findings regarding cortical functioning in 29 prenatally cocaine-exposed (CE) and non-drug-exposed (NDE) 7- to 9-year-old children participating in event related potential (ERP) studies. Methods: ERPs were recorded using 128-electrode high-density arrays while children responded to a standard Stroop paradigm. Results: In the Stroop paradigm, CE children generated prolonged responses to the words while the NDE children produced briefer responses. Effects were noted in the region of the initial positive peak (P1), the second negative peak (N2) and the later positive peak (P3). Conclusions: Early cocaine exposure may inhibit the specialization and streamlining of brain region involvement during cognitive processing such that task processing is slower to begin, requires more diverse cortical involvement, and requires more time to complete. ERP methodology has considerable potential for studying frontal maturation and may provide additional information to clarify generally the specific effects of prenatal CE on cortical functioning and the developmental course of cognitive functions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available