Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages 1223-1226Publisher
EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.060
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Ultrasound of the brachial artery is widely used to assess endothelial function, but whether brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) differs between women and men who have coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been examined. To investigate gender-based differences in brachial artery FMD as an indicator of significant CAD, FMD was measured in women and men outpatients who had CAD (coronary stenosis > 50%, n = 64) and those who did not have significant CAD (n = 145). FMD in women who had CAD (n = 33, 9.1 +/- 0.8%) was higher than that in similarly aged men who had CAD (n = 31, 6.4 +/- 0.5%; p = 0.008). The FMD cutpoint that maximized sensitivity with least effect on specificity for screening CAD was 15% (91% sensitivity, 25% specificity) in women but 10% (90% sensitivity, 43% specificity) in men. If the cutpoint as defined in men were used to evaluate women, brachial artery ultrasound would fail to diagnose 42% of women who do not have significant CAD; thus, a higher FMD cutpoint is required to optimize the sensitivity of FMD for identifying women who have significant CAD compared with similarly aged men. In studies using FMD to evaluate cardiovascular risk, different standards should be applied for women and men. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available