4.4 Article

Differential effects of 5-fluorouracil on glucose transport and expressions of glucose transporter proteins in gastric cancer cells

Journal

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 270-276

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328334562c

Keywords

5-fluorouracil; gastric cancer; glucose transport

Funding

  1. Kyung Hee University Research Fund [KHU-20071508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of gastric cancer, the underlying mechanism for 5-FU resistant phenotype, has yet to be elucidated. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of gastric cancer to 5-FU treatment might be related to the rate of glucose transport ( GLUT), and investigated the expressions of GLUT1, 2, 3, and 4 in two different gastric cancer cells (SNU-216, moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma; and SNU-668, signet ring cell gastric carcinoma). Immunohistochemistry of GLUT1 and GLUT4 and immunoblot analysis of glycogen synthase kinase 3 were also performed. Hexokinase activity was measured. We found that 5-FU suppressed glucose uptake in SNU-216, while it stimulated GLUT in SNU-668. Further analysis revealed that 5-FU decreased the expression levels of GLUT1, 2, and 4 in SNU-216 cells and increased the expression levels of GLUT1, 2, and 4 in SNU-668 cells. Consistent with GLUT expression levels, immunohistochemistry analysis showed that 5-FU increased GLUT1 and GLUT4 levels in SNU-216 and decreased GLUT1 and GLUT4 levels in SNU-668. We also observed that glycogen synthase kinase 3 activity was decreased in SNU-216 and increased in SNU-668 with 5-FU treatment. No significant difference in hexokinase activities was observed with 5-FU treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that 5-FU exerts differential effects on GLUT depending on gastric cancer cell types, which may indicate a possible explanation, at least in part, for the differing responses to 5-FU chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 21: 270-276 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available