4.5 Article

Paraquat neurotoxicity is distinct from that of MPTP and rotenone

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 193-201

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi304

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; rotenone; MPTP; paraquat; dopamine transporter; complex I

Categories

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES009248, U54 ES012068, F32ES013457] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [T32NS07480, R01 NS037031] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paraquat, MPTP, and rotenone reproduce features of Parkinson's disease (PD) in experimental animals. The exact mechanisms by which these compounds damage the dopamine system are not firmly established, but selective damage to dopamine neurons and inhibition of complex I are thought to be involved. We and others have previously documented that the toxic metabolite of MPTP, MPP+, is transported into dopamine neurons through the dopamine transporter (DAT), while rotenone is not transported by DAT. We have also demonstrated the requirement for complex I inhibition and oxidative damage in the dopaminergic neurodegeneration produced by rotenone. Based on structural similarity to MPP+, it has been proposed that paraquat exerts selective dopaminergic toxicity through transport by the DAT and subsequent inhibition of mitochondrial complex I. In this study we report that paraquat is neither a substrate nor inhibitor of DAT. We also demonstrate that in vivo exposure to MPTP and rotenone, but not paraquat, inhibits binding of H-3-dihydrorotenone to complex I in brain mitochondria. Rotenone and MPP+ were both effective inhibitors of complex I activity in isolated brain mitochondria, while paraquat exhibited weak inhibitory effects only at millimolar concentrations. These data indicate that, despite the apparent structural similarity to MPP+, paraquat exerts its deleterious effects on dopamine neurons in a manner that is unique from rotenone and MPTP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available