4.7 Article

High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury

Journal

CHEST
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages 3098-3108

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3098

Keywords

ARDS; fluid balance; sepsis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: Recent data have suggested that ventilatory strategy could influence outcomes from acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS. We tested the hypothesis that infection/sepsis and use of higher tidal volumes than those applied in the ARDS Network (ARDSnet) study (> 7.4 mL/kg of predicted body weight) would worsen outcome in patients with ALI/ARDS. Design: International cohort, observational study. Setting: One hundred ninety-eight European ICUs participating in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients study. Patients or participants: All 3,147 adult patients admitted to one of the participating ICUs between May 1, 2002, and May 15, 2002. Interventions: None. Measurements and results: Patients were followed up until death, hospital discharge, or for 60 days. Of the 3,147 patients, 393 patients (12.5%) had ALI/ARDS. ICU and hospital mortality was higher in patients with ALI/ARDS than those without ALI/ARDS (38.9% vs 15.6% and 45.5% vs 21.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression analysis with ICU outcome as the dependent factor showed that the independent risks for mortality were, as follows: presence of cancer, use of tidal volumes higher than those used by the ARDSnet study, degree of multiorgan dysfunction, and higher mean fluid balance. Sepsis, septic shock, and oxygenation at the onset of ALI/ARDS were not independently associated with higher mortality rates. Conclusions: In addition to comorbidities and organ dysfunction, high tidal volumes and positive fluid balance are associated with a worse outcome from ALI/ARDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available