4.7 Article

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and the Churg-Strauss syndrome

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 143, Issue 9, Pages 632-638

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: since testing for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) became available for routine evaluation, no large homogeneous cohort of patients with the Churg-Strauss syndrome has been studied. Objective: To define the clinical and biological characteristics of newly diagnosed Churg-Strauss syndrome, according to the presence or absence of ANCA. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of manifestations of participants who were enrolled in treatment trials between December 1995 and December 2002. Setting: Multicenter study in 63 clinical centers in France, Belgium, Latvia, and the United Kingdom, coordinated by the French Vasculitis Study Group. Participants: 112 patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome that was recently diagnosed on the basis of current classifications. Measurements: The authors compared principal demographic, clinical, and laboratory features according to ANCA status at diagnosis. Results: The authors detected ANCA in 43 (38%) patients. Positive ANCA status at diagnosis was associated with renal involvement, peripheral neuropathy, and biopsy-proven vasculitis, whereas negative ANCA status was associated with heart disease and fever. Limitations: The authors assessed ANCA by immunofluorescence, but they did not assess ANCA centrally or systematically retest if ANCA was undetected at diagnosis. Conclusions: Phenotypically, ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative Churg-Strauss syndrome might differ. The association of ANCA positivity with clinical symptoms that indicate inflammation and necrosis of small vessels might characterize a predominantly vasculitic pattern of the Churg-Strauss syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available